Rensch said his platform had developed an industry-leading anti-cheating model trained on a staggering trove of real-world game data from games played on its platform.
Photograph: Sri Loganathan/Zuma Press Wire/Rex/Shutterstock Magnus Carlsen had declined to say why he resigned from an online game with Hans Niemann after just one move. The problem is our position is so different in terms of how we look at it and measure things.” So if neither the tournament nor Magnus is explicitly accusing Niemann of cheating, why do many in the chess world think Niemann is a cheat?ĭanny Rensch, a chess master and executive, told the Guardian that chess watchers – from authorities to armchair theorists – aren’t analyzing Niemann’s performance correctly. The controversy deepened when the platform announced that it had banned Niemann again, citing “information that contradicts his statements regarding the amount and seriousness of his cheating on ”.īut that move contradicts other top chess arbiters, including the Sinquefield Cup’s organizers, who say they have analyzed Niemann’s games and found no evidence of wrongdoing. But he admitted to cheating twice on the online platform at age 12 and again at 16, which he said got him kicked from the website. Niemann denied cheating against Carlsen, commenting after the earlier game that the world champion must be “embarrassed to lose to an idiot like me”. He intoned that he was “impressed by Niemann’s play and I think his mentor Maxim Dlugy must be doing a great job” – another apparent accusation, as Dlugy is a chess master who has been accused of cheating himself. On Wednesday, Carlsen gave a short interview in which he declined to explain his actions, but said “people can draw their own conclusions and they certainly have”.
The uproar continued on Monday, when Carlsen faced Niemann in an online game and resigned after just one move. I've always enjoyed playing in the and hope to be back in the future - Magnus Carlsen September 5, 2022
0 kommentar(er)
